EXPLORE PREHISTORY 220 prehistoric animal profiles · Scientific & movie-style image galleries

EXHIBIT 193

Regaliceratops

Regaliceratops peterhewsi

Regaliceratops had a crown-like frill and an unusual combination of a prominent nasal horn and reduced brow horns. [2]

Evidence profile
PERIODLate Cretaceous[1]
DIETHerbivoreEvidence and uncertainty in the dossier
TOTAL LENGTHSee the dossierEstimate scope matters
FOSSILS FOUNDAlberta, Canada[1]
CompareRead the dossierView the sources

MEET THE ANIMAL

Meet Regaliceratops

Regaliceratops was a horned dinosaur from Late Cretaceous Alberta. Its name means royal horned face, referring to the crown-like edge of its frill. A geologist spotted the fossil snout beside the Oldman River in 2005. After excavation and study, the skull was named in 2015 and became part of the Royal Tyrrell Museum's collection. The discovery added an unusual head shape to the region's rich record of horned dinosaurs. [S1]

Its head combined a large nose horn, small brow horns and an elaborately ornamented frill. That arrangement resembled a different branch of horned dinosaurs more than the usual pattern among its closer relatives. Researchers describe such similarities as evolutionary convergence: comparable features developing along separate branches of a family tree. An impressive resemblance can therefore be misleading when deciding which dinosaurs were most closely related. [S1]

Recovering this skull took years of difficult work, and hard surrounding rock made cleaning it challenging. The preserved head offers strong evidence for its distinctive ornaments. It is a more limited guide to the complete living animal. A decorated fossil skull does not record a courtship performance, tell us which individual was male or female, or show the organization of a living herd. [S1]

Overview sources
  1. Discovering Dinosaurs: Royal Horned Face – Rhodium-Plated Pure Silver CoinRoyal Canadian Mint (2024), with direct accounts by Royal Tyrrell Museum curator François Therrien · Accessed 2026-10-04Inspected: page

PREHISTORIC ANIMAL DOSSIER

A life in profile.

The animal, the evidence, and the questions still open.

The skull combines traits normally associated with different ceratopsid branches. Its missing body and distorted frill limit reconstruction. [D2] [D1]

Profile scope: R. peterhewsi, holotype TMP 2005.055.0001: cranium only, lacking the lower jaw and rostral bone. [D1]

Time
Late Cretaceous
Fossil locations in this exhibit
Alberta, Canada
How to read the evidence

Source supported identifies a description documented by the cited source. Inferred marks a reconstruction or functional estimate. Debated marks competing interpretations. Not established means the sources reviewed for this dossier do not support a firm conclusion; it does not mean a behavior never occurred.

A size reference is an estimate, not a population range. Nesting evidence does not by itself establish courtship, mate choice, or lifelong pairing.

Length

Not established

Not established here

The reviewed type is a cranium; no inspected specimen-scoped whole-body length reconstruction establishes its body size. [D1]

Body mass

Not established

Not established here

A skull-only specimen does not provide a measured mass; no defensible specimen-scoped mass model was located. [D1]

Diet

Inferred

Plant eater

Herbivory inferred from ceratopsid relationships; a specific menu or preserved meal is not established here. [D4]

Time and habitat

Inferred

Probably middle Maastrichtian; southern Alberta

Oldman River locality. Upper St. Mary River Formation is preferred; faulting complicates separation from lowermost Willow Creek strata. [D1]

Locomotion

Inferred

Four-legged body plan

Ceratopsid posture inferred comparatively; genus-specific trackways, gait and speed are not established here. [D4]

Distinctive anatomy

Source supported

Crown-like frill; reduced brow horns

Large flattened marginal processes and a central process decorate the frill. The nasal tip is missing and restored length is estimated. [D1]

Reproduction & life together

Reproduction and life cycle

Not established

Not established here

Brow-core resorption records skull modification; it does not establish sex, reproductive maturity, eggs, nests or parental care. [D1]

Mating and courtship

Not established

Not established here

Ceratopsian sexual-selection hypotheses are comparative. Ornament shape does not establish this genus’s mate choice, courtship sequence or sex-specific roles. [D3]

Social behavior

Not established

Not established here

The described evidence centers on one cranium; it cannot establish solitary living, herd structure or group size. [D1]

Dossier research & sources

Sources and inspection notes for the claims in this profile.

  1. A New Horned Dinosaur Reveals Convergent Evolution in Cranial Ornamentation in CeratopsidaeCurrent Biology; Brown and Henderson (2015) · Accessed 2026-10-02Original full article and figures inspected. Type is nearly complete cranium, not a skeleton; nasal tip missing; deformation; upper St. Mary River placement preferred but faulted exposures complicate formation assignment. Supplement not independently obtained. · Inspected: page
  2. New species of horned dinosaur with 'bizarre' features revealedCell Press news release (4 June 2015) · Accessed 2026-10-02Indexed original institutional release inspected: discovery, difficult preparation, unusual ornament combination and convergence. No independently scoped whole-body size model. · Inspected: excerpt
  3. Patterns of divergence in the morphology of ceratopsian dinosaurs: sympatry is not a driver of ornament evolutionProceedings of the Royal Society B; Knapp, Knell, Farke, Loewen and Hone (2018) · Accessed 2026-10-02Original full text inspected. Comparative ornament-divergence analysis; sexual-selection hypothesis is not a directly observed mating behavior or identified sex. · Inspected: page
  4. Osteological correlates for quadrupedality in ornithischian dinosaursActa Palaeontologica Polonica; Maidment and Barrett (2014) · Accessed 2026-10-02Original full paper inspected. Ceratopsidae treated as quadrupedal within herbivorous Ornithischia; application to skull-only taxa is explicitly comparative. · Inspected: page

THE STORY IN THE FOSSILS

A crown assembled from an unusual combination

Brown and Henderson interpreted the prominent nasal horn and reduced brows as convergence with the ornament pattern of centrosaurines, although Regaliceratops is a chasmosaurine. [2]

Ceratopsian ornament-divergence research supports testing display hypotheses, but an impressive frill cannot reveal an individual’s sex or a particular courtship routine. [3]

A note on scale and time

The dossier identifies the scope of each reference estimate. A mount, an individual fossil and a species-wide adult range are different measurements. Comparison metrics remain unavailable where adult scope has not been established. Unknown does not mean zero.

Sources & editorial notes

Sources support the stated claims and scopes. Refer to the evidence notes for uncertainty.

  1. A New Horned Dinosaur Reveals Convergent Evolution in Cranial Ornamentation in CeratopsidaeCurrent Biology; Brown and Henderson (2015) · Accessed 2026-10-02Original full article and figures inspected. Type is nearly complete cranium, not a skeleton; nasal tip missing; deformation; upper St. Mary River placement preferred but faulted exposures complicate formation assignment. Supplement not independently obtained. · Inspected: page
  2. New species of horned dinosaur with 'bizarre' features revealedCell Press news release (4 June 2015) · Accessed 2026-10-02Indexed original institutional release inspected: discovery, difficult preparation, unusual ornament combination and convergence. No independently scoped whole-body size model. · Inspected: excerpt
  3. Patterns of divergence in the morphology of ceratopsian dinosaurs: sympatry is not a driver of ornament evolutionProceedings of the Royal Society B; Knapp, Knell, Farke, Loewen and Hone (2018) · Accessed 2026-10-02Original full text inspected. Comparative ornament-divergence analysis; sexual-selection hypothesis is not a directly observed mating behavior or identified sex. · Inspected: page
  4. Osteological correlates for quadrupedality in ornithischian dinosaursActa Palaeontologica Polonica; Maidment and Barrett (2014) · Accessed 2026-10-02Original full paper inspected. Ceratopsidae treated as quadrupedal within herbivorous Ornithischia; application to skull-only taxa is explicitly comparative. · Inspected: page

FOLLOW YOUR CURIOSITY

Who will you meet next?

KEEP EXPLORING

More from the collection