EXPLORE PREHISTORY 220 prehistoric animal profiles · Scientific & movie-style image galleries

EXHIBIT 214

Nothronychus

Nothronychus mckinleyi and N. graffami

Dinosaur

Nothronychus was a therizinosaur with a small head, long neck, broad abdomen and impressive hand claws. [3]

Evidence profile
PERIODLate Cretaceous[1]
DIETHerbivoreEvidence and uncertainty in the dossier
TOTAL LENGTHSee the dossierEstimate scope matters
FOSSILS FOUNDUnited States[1]
CompareRead the dossierView the sources

MEET THE ANIMAL

Meet Nothronychus

Nothronychus belonged to the therizinosaurs, an unusual branch of the two-legged theropod dinosaurs. Its long neck, small head and roomy belly made it look very different from a large meat-eating hunter. The Natural History Museum of Utah interprets this body plan as suited to plant feeding. Its unusually large, curved hand claws are striking, but their appearance alone does not reveal every activity they performed. The Utah specimen reached a sea after death, although its anatomy belonged to a land animal. [D3]

Two species have separate skeletons. Burial pressure altered some bone shapes; the Utah body lacks a skull. [D1]

Scientists can investigate movement even when muscles and ligaments are missing. A recent study reconstructed hip ligaments using marks on the bones and comparisons with other animals. Its model suggests a wide-legged, slower-moving dinosaur whose knees supplied much of its leg motion. That is a tested anatomical hypothesis, rather than a film of a walking animal or a measurement of its running speed. [D4]

PREHISTORIC ANIMAL DOSSIER

A life in profile.

The animal, the evidence, and the questions still open.

Partial skull and body bones help reconstruct this unusual theropod. Hip-ligament research proposes a slow, wide-legged gait rather than measuring an actual walking animal. [D2] [D4]

Profile scope: Genus — Nothronychus; two species represented by separate partial skeletons. [D1]

Time
Late Cretaceous
Fossil locations in this exhibit
United States
How to read the evidence

Source supported identifies a description documented by the cited source. Inferred marks a reconstruction or functional estimate. Debated marks competing interpretations. Not established means the sources reviewed for this dossier do not support a firm conclusion; it does not mean a behavior never occurred.

A size reference is an estimate, not a population range. Nesting evidence does not by itself establish courtship, mate choice, or lifelong pairing.

Body length

Inferred

About 5.3 m (educational genus reference)

The museum does not identify one measured individual or growth stage; this is not a species maximum. [D2]

Body mass

Not established

Not established here

The inspected sources provide no comparable, maturity-qualified body-mass estimate adopted here. [D2]

Diet and feeding

Inferred

Plant feeding inferred

Small head and capacious gut support herbivory; a museum also labels the genus omnivorous. No particular meal is established. [D3] [D2]

Habitat and setting

Inferred

Terrestrial western North America

The Utah carcass reached an offshore sea; marine Tropic Shale burial does not show an aquatic lifestyle. [D3]

Movement

Inferred

Bipedal, broad-gauge gait proposed

A ligament model suggests restricted hip motion and slower progression. It does not provide an observed gait or measured speed. [D4]

Recognizable anatomy

Source supported

Long neck and large claws

The Utah museum emphasizes a small head and broad gut in its plant-feeding reconstruction. [D3]

Reproduction & life together

Reproduction and nesting

Not established

Not established here

Focused searches and reviewed osteology found no assigned eggs, nests or parental-care evidence. [D1]

Mating and courtship

Not established

Not established here

The reviewed museum directory supplies no taxon-specific mating, courtship or sex-color evidence. [D2]

Social behavior

Not established

Not established here

Transported bones do not demonstrate a living herd. [D1]

Dossier research & sources

Sources and inspection notes for the claims in this profile.

  1. The Slothful Claw: Osteology and Taphonomy of Nothronychus mckinleyi and N. graffami (Hedrick et al., 2015)PLOS ONE 10(6):e0129449 · Accessed 2026-10-05Full original osteology, species diagnoses, specimens and taphonomy inspected. N. mckinleyi MSM P2117 comes from the middle Turonian Moreno Hill Formation of New Mexico; N. graffami UMNH VP16420 comes from early Turonian Tropic Shale in Utah. The latter lacks a skull and was transported offshore. Differences in ulnar curvature can reflect burial compression; mixed, transported bone accumulations do not establish social behavior. · Inspected: page
  2. Nothronychus dinosaur directoryNatural History Museum, London · Accessed 2026-10-05Institutional directory inspected: 5.3 m is an educational genus reference without fossil-individual or maturity scope. Its omnivorous label differs from the plant-feeding anatomical interpretation in the Utah museum profile; neither identifies a preserved meal. · Inspected: page
  3. Kane County — Nothronychus graffamiNatural History Museum of Utah · Accessed 2026-10-05Full institutional account inspected: small head, long neck, wide gut and large hand claws support herbivory; the land animal was washed into a marine setting. The 14-foot reference applies to the displayed N. graffami reconstruction and is not pooled with the London genus reference. · Inspected: page
  4. Reconstruction of soft noncontractile tissue in the derived therizinosaur Nothronychus (Smith and Gillette, 2023)Journal of Morphology 284(5):e21579 · Accessed 2026-10-05Original indexed abstract inspected. Hip-ligament reconstruction from fossil scars and comparative anatomy proposes restricted femoral motion, laterally abducted femur and slow broad-gauge progression. This is a functional model, not a Nothronychus trackway or measured speed. · Inspected: abstract

THE STORY IN THE FOSSILS

Evidence behind Nothronychus

The best-known Utah skeleton came from rocks laid down at sea. Its bones nevertheless belong to a land-dwelling dinosaur. [3]

Reconstructing motion also means restoring missing soft tissues. The proposed hip ligaments constrain a possible gait without preserving actual footsteps. [4]

A note on scale and time

The dossier identifies the scope of each reference estimate. A mount, an individual fossil and a species-wide adult range are different measurements. Comparison metrics remain unavailable where adult scope has not been established. Unknown does not mean zero.

Sources & editorial notes

Sources support the stated claims and scopes. Refer to the evidence notes for uncertainty.

  1. The Slothful Claw: Osteology and Taphonomy of Nothronychus mckinleyi and N. graffami (Hedrick et al., 2015)PLOS ONE 10(6):e0129449 · Accessed 2026-10-05Full original osteology, species diagnoses, specimens and taphonomy inspected. N. mckinleyi MSM P2117 comes from the middle Turonian Moreno Hill Formation of New Mexico; N. graffami UMNH VP16420 comes from early Turonian Tropic Shale in Utah. The latter lacks a skull and was transported offshore. Differences in ulnar curvature can reflect burial compression; mixed, transported bone accumulations do not establish social behavior. · Inspected: page
  2. Nothronychus dinosaur directoryNatural History Museum, London · Accessed 2026-10-05Institutional directory inspected: 5.3 m is an educational genus reference without fossil-individual or maturity scope. Its omnivorous label differs from the plant-feeding anatomical interpretation in the Utah museum profile; neither identifies a preserved meal. · Inspected: page
  3. Kane County — Nothronychus graffamiNatural History Museum of Utah · Accessed 2026-10-05Full institutional account inspected: small head, long neck, wide gut and large hand claws support herbivory; the land animal was washed into a marine setting. The 14-foot reference applies to the displayed N. graffami reconstruction and is not pooled with the London genus reference. · Inspected: page
  4. Reconstruction of soft noncontractile tissue in the derived therizinosaur Nothronychus (Smith and Gillette, 2023)Journal of Morphology 284(5):e21579 · Accessed 2026-10-05Original indexed abstract inspected. Hip-ligament reconstruction from fossil scars and comparative anatomy proposes restricted femoral motion, laterally abducted femur and slow broad-gauge progression. This is a functional model, not a Nothronychus trackway or measured speed. · Inspected: abstract

FOLLOW YOUR CURIOSITY

Who will you meet next?

KEEP EXPLORING

More from the collection

Illustrative reconstruction of Pentaceratops with a long frill, brow and nasal horns and projecting cheek horns.
Movie-style interpretation
Late Cretaceous

Pentaceratops

Pentaceratops sternbergii

Pentaceratops was a horned plant eater from Late Cretaceous New Mexico. Its name counts the prominent cheek projections alongside the nasal and brow horns, while disputed giant material requires separate treatment.